Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:11
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are some of the most annoying movie clichés?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
No. 2 Coco Gauff faces No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in French Open women’s final - NBC Sports
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why do unattractive men assume that a pretty woman like me want them?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why are Capri cigarettes so expensive?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Horoscope for Wednesday, June 11, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Will German support for Ukraine decrease after the early elections on February 23, 2025?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
This Type of Fiber Could Have Weight Loss Benefits Similar to Ozempic - ScienceAlert